Photography: the Beginning.
This post is designed to help those of you looking to buy a camera figure out which one is the best fit for you. I've divided it up into the the four main issues I hear most people talking about: Megapixels (whatever those are); personal style/vision (not something people talk about too much, but knowing it will save you a lot of money!); what is an SLR; and how much you should pay for all this stuff.
Megapixels
They're not really that important. There's an industry term for this; it's called hype. Anything bigger than 6MP will give you a good quality print out. My advice here it to not let this not be a selling point. This might lead into the question of why cameras with a crazy amount of megapixels, some in excess of a hundred, exist. There are reasons, but they will cost you more than your car to find out. I chose to keep my car, so I can't tell you.
I will have another post coming soon which is a continuation of this aimed at intermediate photographers who have been shooting for a while. In this coming post I'll discuss some advantages and disadvantages of megapixel count.
Your Photography Style (or Vision)
This is the only part of this review that is not technical, and, as a result, not something I can directly advise you on; however, I mention it because knowing your style (or vision, that is, end objective) will better help you understand what camera best fits your needs. First you need to define what you want to shoot: people (portraits/events), nature (flora/fauna), or landscapes. There are others, but these cover the basics. Next, you'll need to explore how you want to shoot: hobbyist (just for fun, whenever), journalistic, documentary, commercial (ie: a product), or editorial (think: magazine).
If all this is starting to make your head hurt, that means you're doing it right. But if you're not ready to tediously define all these aspects of your photographic soul, that's okay, too. Just take pictures of what you like. That's usually a big indication of where you fit in.
By finding your vision, you'll know what kind of gear you need. For instance, if you shoot documentary-street photography, you won't need to buy one of those $20,000 rigs that a sports shooter uses. Not only will it be cumbersome and leave you with one less kidney, but anyone you try to photograph will see you coming a mile away. Maybe two. I'm not sure.
To SLR or not to SLR
SLR or DSLR stands for [Digital] Single Lens Reflex. In other words, that's the one where the lens comes off. Here's how an SLR (or DSLR) works. You look through the viewfinder (or in LiveView mode, the LCD on the back) which, with the help of a mirror, shows you exactly what the lens sees. When you take a picture, the mirror flies up, the shutters opens and closes, and the mirror falls back down, all in a fraction of a second. The mirror is what gives an SLR it's cool sound. This is what originally made me want to become a photographer.
Not kidding.
So why do you need an SLR when a point-and-shoot can fit in your pocket and cost, at most, half of an entry level SLR? In short, because they're fast and sharp.
In 2 seconds flat you can power-on, focus, and take 3 pictures with an entry level SLR where a point-and-shoot would still be showing you the welcome screen while it automatically starts extending and retracting it's built-in lens (why do they always do that?). That might seem like overkill, but if you have kids or like to photograph nature or sports, it's just about a necessity to catch those perfect moments.
The "fast" I mentioned comes into play with the lens. If you look look at the end of the lens on your point-and-shoot or SLR, you'll see something that looks like 1:3.5-5.6 or 1:2.8. Without getting technical the closer the second number in the ratio is to 1, the more light the lens lets in. The more light mean the faster shutter speed. Hence, faster.
But why does the lens need to come off? The reason for this is because there are many different options when it comes to lenses: telephoto (narrow, close field of view; often isolates your subject from the background and surrounding elements), wide-angle (alternate to a telephoto; shows a very wide field of view), zoom (able to change the focal length), and prime (fixed focal length: the type of zoom you operate with your feet. aka: walking.). Nature and candid photographers (and often portrait photographers) use telephoto (zoom or prime) lenses. Journalists tend to use wide-angle lenses to capture many aspects in one picture (good for story-telling). Zooms are moderately fast, but save you the trouble of having to move to get the shot. Primes have fixed focal lengths (always the same field of view), and tend to be much faster and sharper than zooms. If you find yourself taking pictures inside where the light is low but don't want to use a flash, primes are a good option. Those huge-mongus lenses you see sports photographers using are also (telephoto) primes.
"Faster" also refers to focusing. SLRs do it faster.
Price
"You paid what?!" In the end, you get what you pay for. But before you pay for what you get, you need to know what you're really getting. What. yeah. Keep reading.
When shopping for a camera, you'll get the best deal when you do the 3 following things:
• Know your style. A salesman can't talk you into something you know isn't for you. Don't be afraid to look around--especially in today's economy, nothing is flying off of anyone's shelves.
• Make sure the camera feels comfortable in your hands. If it doesn't you probably won't use it.
• Taking pictures is about making memories. If you feel offloading an obscene amount of cash makes a difference (you know, where you give yourself the "good investment" speech), there are better charities than camera stores and credit cards that can help you here.
I posted about them a few days ago.
Happy New Years Eve!
TuesdAy MusIC
I heard Finger Eleven's Paralyzer on the radio the other day. I was curious who it was so I Shazammed it, and usually when this is the case, I listen to a few times on Youtube, hear it a few more times on the radio, and I'm good. And the song's good, but what's making it show up in my post is the video. It started out like a normal 'band video.' But then there's this crazy, side show of choreographed mod-squad dancers all dressed in black and white. I have no idea what it means or how it relates to the video, but it just made the song ten times better.
And on a side note, doesn't the lead singer remind you a little of Art Garfunkel?
White Rabbits released It's Frightening earlier this year. It's a cool compilation of beat driven songs that seem to want to be orchestrated but never quite get all that in order. To their advantage, I think. Kind of reminds me of Spoon.
Casa Garcia + Coffee
Saturday night I went to Casa Garcia's with some friends. After we went to Cafe du Monde and most of us went on to sleep through Sherlock Holmes.
Sherlock Holmes. Guy Richie, I'm sad.




This is Sal and Katie. I realized when I got back home that they were the only ones in my pictures, but then I thought about it and remembered that everyone else was too close to me to focus.
Sal, from Jordan, had never seen a redneck. So, we were trying to describe one to him. This guy wasn't really a redneck, but it was, like, 40 degrees outside, and he was wearing a wifebeater. So... he made the blog.
This is Sal eating beignets. Before he choked.

Christmas Eve for Not-You
Today after work I'm going to my Aunt's house, which is something my family does each year on Christmas Eve. We all have an excuse to be together and, cold or not, the excitement and warmth of Christmas is in the air. It seems no matter hold old I get (and each years manages to trade-in a little more excitement for stress) Christmas Eve is a time I always look forward to.
That's me. And I'm probably not too far off in assuming that's you, too. But it's not the case for everyone. For many people, it's just another day of surviving and waiting for tomorrow because it might be better than today.
Recently I worked for Missionary Expediters, a logistics company that specializes in shipping cargo for humanitarian aid organizations. In doing so I had the great pleasure to meet and work alongside many selfless people. People who would often work long hours. Although the paychecks might be small, their reward is in the hearty smiles and eager anticipation of people they serve.
I plan to write more in a later post about the individual agencies and what they do, but in the meantime, here are a few you can check out:
Because of our exchange rate in the US, you can sponsor a child from as little as $35 a month. If you smoke or routinely pick-up a daily pre-work coffee, that's like sponsoring two kids a month! Really, it's not a lot at all. I've been doing it for almost two years now and am constantly rewarded from the knowledge that this is probably the best $35 I spend each month. And everyone I've talked to who does this tells me the same thing.

Carols in Jackson Square: The Natives
This past Sunday was the night when everyone gets together in Jackson Square to sing Christmas carols. Ultimately, pictures of that amount to a mass of people holding little candles and standing with their mouths open. That's lovely, but I decided to focus on the natives that often blend into the scenery of the French Quarter.
Enjoy!




It's true; I would be remis if I did not show the carolers.

ICR

I know, I know, Tuesday is for music, but I'm changing it up this week! I think it's because of Christmas, but I can't be sure.
Anyway.
Recently I've been hearing almost daily updates about the calamities progress we're making in Copenhagen. And that's okay; after all, I keep reading those articles, so I'm not wishing they'd go away. But I can't help to disagree the basis of much of their reasoning.
If you've never heard of ICR (the Institute for Creation Research), you should really check them out.
A privately funded research facility focused on proving biblical creationism from a scientific and professional point of view, ICR has been in existence for almost 40 years! But unfortunately many Christians are still not familiar with them. They publish regularly supporting evidence on critical topics including the six, literal days of creation; the genesis flood and a young Earth; and the extinction of the dinosaurs, to name a few.
Among the plethora of tools ICR offers are two FREE publications: Days of Praise and Acts & Facts. You can read both of these online, or, if you prefer to feel the paper in your hand, they'll mail them to you. Free. Did I say that?
Days of Praise is a short, daily devotion. Wait. If you're anything like me, when you first hear the word "devotional", you started skimming this paragraph. And to your credit, from all the ones I've read, I don't blame you for feeling that way. But Henry Morris III, the CEO and son of founder Henry Morris II, does an over-the-top job of concisely diving deep and sharing his insights in this two-minute-a-day read (a rare feat in it's own right). I strongly recommend it for both it's brevity and clearness of thought. Two things not often found together in devotionals.
Acts & Facts is a monthly periodical with articles covering the gamut 'of ICR'. Always providing captivating insight in the fields of paleontology, geology, evolution, as well as a biblical view on current events. ICR works diligently to compare the "truth" to the Truth.
In this writing, I don't want to leave the impression that their mission is to cause strive and confrontation. In fact, it's just the oposite. Their mission is to help Christians see, from a logical and scientific perspective, the biblical proofs that exist all around us in our modern, twenty-first century life--that science is not at odds with the Bible, but in agreement!
As you continue to hear about climate change and become curious about how it fits into the Bible, IRC is a wonderful resource to find Christian in the top of their field, who don't pull punches when it comes to comparing the facts they find with what God has to say about our world.
Yeah,
BAM.
My new Neighborhood.
I was walking around my new neighborhood in Lakeview the other day (and one from my old). I've been kind of busy this weekend crashing cars and such. In case you haven't seen, take a look: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=32594048&l=c3998a7b6a&id=45702422




Caroline & Will portraits
Here are some shots I did a few weeks ago of Caroline and Will. As a lucky break for us, we caught everything while it was still pretty. That night all the greenery making up the background froze and died. It was hard to believe in less than twenty-four hours the Sun was gone, they sky was grey, and everything else was brown.
Here is some just-for-photographers info: More and more I find myself studying light and lighting, not to implement off-camera strobes and flashes, but to try to manipulate the natural light that already exists. I don't mean to insinuate I'm an "available-light" snob, on the contrary I'm a firm believer that the best light is any available light...or however that clever saying goes. But my real motive is to be able to get the best results with just a camera, be it a full 21 megapixels or my iPhone, because that's where I catch myself the most. I often find this provides a more candid view of people; not to mention the opportunities you'd forego by not having your entire lighting trailer present.
It was with this philosophy the below images were made.
The "strobist" stuff: I put the Sun in the background to eliminate its harsh shadow, and then I exposed for their face letting the sky (which was mostly out of the frame) blow out. While testing the location, I noticed that there was a large, white, triangular gable high camera-left. This acted as my key light by bouncing light from the Sun down at a nice 45/45 on my subject's face. What I didn't notice until after is the fence they're standing next to provided a nice catch-light in the eyes. Very cool. And totally on accident. I used the far end of a 70-200 @ 5.6 & 1/400 shutter. I often like to shoot portraits with a very thin depth of field, but when I have more than one person in the frame I rarely do anything bigger than 5.6.
Also, it makes it a little easier to not mess up.
ISO 400.



Out-takes:



Here's an out-take that had too much sun-flair in it. The original image was very pale, but I was able to put some contrast back in. It turned out to be a decent shot of Caroline ...uh, saluting me? And that's Will hiding behind the huge sun-flair. Silly boy.

























